Potential catchment and Local Centres

This image shows the catchment area for the Mega Tesco based on a 10 minute drive (travelling at 15 mph). Unlike the map included in the planning application, provided by the applicant's consultant; this one shows local centres in the area. These will be adversely affected by a huge shop which will sell everything from food to toys, white goods, DVDs, books, electrical goods etc. In 2006 the planning inspector refused permission for an 88,095 sq. ft store and said:

"local shops cater well for the needs of those shoppers who, in particular do not have their own means of transport. These shops are a valuable aid to social inclusion. In this respect it seems to me that the shops at Gorse Hill, the Quadrant and along Ayres Road would be particularly vulnerable to the effects of a large store” (p. 10)

The current application is for a larger store with a higher sales area for comparison goods. We cannot therefore see how this application can be allowed.

If you haven't already objected, please do so before 21st January. Visit the No Mega Tesco website for letters you can tweek to make your own. You can email the letter as well as post it.

How Big, How tall?

Its hard to imagine the scale of the proposed store. There are some like it around - if you travel to Altrincham you can see a Tesco Extra there that is on stilts. On Chester Road there is less space for parking around the store so it is likely to loom over everything closeby much more. Size wise, the Altrincham store is smaller than what is proposed for Chester Road, yet when you look at this view from the air (taken from google maps) you can see it is vast. Compare it to the length and width of surrounding streets of terraced housing and imagine a building 13.5 metres high which is larger than this.

The proposed Chester Road store is 75% larger than this one - so imagine that. If you know anyone who says they just want a supermarket in their area and they don't care how big it is - do try to impress on them just how vast it will be.


There is also a neat aerial shot of the Altrincham store here

We have until 21st January to send in letters of objection. You can get lots of information and letters to use to base your letter on at the No Mega Tesco website.

Don't delay - write today!

Why are supermarkets like buses....... ? Because you wait for ages and then two come along at once

As if an application to build a Mega Tesco weren't enough, now Sainsbury's are getting in on the act in North Trafford. They have applied for planning permission for a store of approx 122,000 sq ft on the site of the old Homebase at White City. This is only half a mile away from the proposed Tesco site.

We are opposed to this store for many of the same reasons as the Tesco, but unfortunately, as there is no 'change of use' for the site (from one retail use to another), we don't feel we have as good a chance of stopping it.

We will continue to focus our energy on fighting the Tesco application, but we do encourage you to write to Trafford planning department and object to the Sainsburys as well, which could have an equal impact on shops in surrounding areas.

Please do write and object as soon as possible using Planning application number 74483/FULL/2009

LCCC tactics

I recently received a copy of a letter sent to a local MP which is titled "Executive Summary of the Lancashire County Cricket Club/Tesco planning application" no author for this 2 page document but it is necessary to set the record straight on a number of points included in the letter.

1) Size of the store
The letter states:

"The retail sales floor area of the store is approximately 100,000 sq ft. Opponents of the store cite much larger gross areas but these are misleading as they include for a wide range of non retail space, for example, storage areas, staff rooms, cafes, toilets, atrium areas, escalators, fire escapes.

It is the sales area of the store which is the key consideration as this drives turnover and determines the level of impact a store will have."

LCCC's own consultation exercise initially failed to mention the size of the store on its display boards whilst asking people to say in a questionniare whether they were in favour of a supermarket as part of the develoment.

When this was pointed out as highly misleading the boards were amended to include a size of 140,000 sq. ft - which we were told at the time was the gross floorspace.

When the planning application finally went into TMBC it was for a store with a gross size of 166,847 sq. ft. LCCC is trying to give the impression that the store will be smaller than the initially stated size of 140,000 by publicising a net floorspace size of 100,000 sq. ft in all its press releases and this letter.

People understandably have no idea what all this means - how big is that? Well, inside and out its rougly the size of the Eastlands Asda at Sports City. Or for locals around 5 times the size of the PC World across the road. In terms of height - the equivalent of a 5 story building - but how many 5 storey buildings do you know with a footprint of that size?

Why must the local community live with a store this size when there is already planning permission for a store of 'anchor' size? Wouldn't local people who want a supermarket in their area be happy with a store the size of the Sainsbuy's in Urmston? They tell us they would. The planning inspector said in 2006 that a larger store (88,095 sq. ft) would have been too large and would impact adversely on other local centres.

2) Retail impact assessment (I think they mean retail need study)
The letter states:
"A detailed retail impact assessment is submitted with our application - this demonstrates (a) that there is a need for a store of this scale in this location (currently local people are forced to drive to alternative locations because of lack of provision) and (b) that the impact of the store (any new store will have some impact) is entirely within acceptable levels."

The retail need study fails to account for the considerable number of local shops in the proposed store's catchment area. In 2006 Tesco consultants GL Hearn provided a helpful map which showed 31 local and neighbourhood centres within the catchment area of the proposed 88,095 sq. ft. store. Such information is absent from this application. Will trafford planning department be asking for details or will they simply accept the flawed retail needs study provided?

The blog here about Ayres Road's 47 shops and services not mentioned in the retail need study provides an example of the vital contribution that a local centre can provide in a community - these shops will be affected by a mega store.
in 2006 the planning inspector said:

“local shops cater well for the needs of those shoppers who, in particular do not have their own means of transport. Those shops are a valuable aid to social inclusion. In this respect it seems to me that the shops at Gorse Hill, the Quadrant and along Ayres Road would be particularly vulnerable to the effects of a large store.”

Office of National Statistics data shows that 52% of people living in the area served by Ayers Road shops have no car. Is it right that such vulnerable stores and their customers should suffer so that Tesco can build a very very large store when they already have permission for a large store?

This is too high a price for local communities to pay so that Old Trafford might see Test cricket again (if the Welsh Assembly doesn't help Glamorgan to outbid LCCC again). LCCC should find another way to fund the re-development of their private members club ground.

Campaign in the media

A letter sent in by Richard Fowler in response to a story in the Metro News.
For some reason its not been reproduced online so we thought we'd make it visible here.


The claims made by Jim Cumbes and Councillor Colledge in their letters to Trafford Metro News (Metro News, 11 December 2009) are, at best, disingenuous.

For example, they include claims that the Tesco/LCCC proposal is the only option if international cricket is to return to Old Trafford. Perhaps, then, they can explain why tickets for two international cricket matches taking place in June 2010 are already advertised on the LCCC website.

As for a groundswell of opinion from local residents wanting LCCC to remain in Trafford, that depends on how you ask the question. If you ask “Would you like LCCC to stay in Trafford or move elsewhere?”, of course people will say yes, they want LCCC to stay. But if you ask “Would you like Trafford Council to hand over £21million of public funds to subsidise the privately owned LCCC, with a new and very large Tesco and all the increased traffic congestion that will entail, while local shops are put out of business?”, you will get a very different answer.

The term 'sports-led regeneration' is misleading and dishonest – the proposals won't do anything to regenerate the area in the interests of local people, instead only serving to benefit two private entities, LCCC and Tesco, at the expense of residents in the vicinity of the site and of Trafford in general who will ALL be subsidising this scheme. As for his claims of supporting community cohesion,what about the inevitable closure of local shops (and the loss of jobs that go with it)? The extra £16m per year won't be go into the local economy at all, so what possible benefits are there for local people? Don't spend too long pondering this, because the first answer you come up with is the right one – there won't be any.

Source: p4 of Trafford Metro News, 18th December 2009.

Save our local shops

Those who support the Tesco plans to build a 166,847 sq. ft superstore on Chester Road in Stretford will often say there are no local shops in the area - therefore its OK to have a (disproportionately) large supermarket in the area.

We would counter this argument by pointing out that the catchment area of the store is a 10 minute drive... which takes in independent local shops in Urmston, Stretford, Whalley Range, Sale, Ashton on Mersey and Chorlton as well as other smaller clusters such as Ayres Road shops in Old Trafford.

These shops are never included in any retail assessments in planning applications. Why? They are not chains - if you look closely at any documents on this subject you'll soon see that only chains are listed. Other shops are lumped together (e.g. Sale town centre) with inadequate research on the range of shops provided.

Case study: Ayres Road, Old Trafford
By way of a little case study lets look at the Ayres Road shops. Its a residential street close to the boundary between Trafford MBC and Manchester City Council. On this street you will find: a bakery, 5 butchers, 3 fabric and tailoring shops, 7 small grocery shops, an ice cream parlour, a household goods shop, 2 doctors surgeries, a dentist and four hair and beauty salons. Also (pausing for breath) 3 newsagents, 3 off licences, a pet shop, two pharmacies, a post office, two telecommunications shops, a betting shop, a cafe, 3 take aways, two travel agencies and a video/DVD hire outlet. Very close by, on Henrietta Street is All in One DIY - selling most of what a chain DIY shop will have, but for less. Not a chain amongst them.

Yet when you examine the retail assessment (74393-RetailAssessment.pdf) for the planning application the only Old Trafford shops listed are Aldi, Iceland and a Tesco Express. Needless to say they then go on to claim that there is a deficit of shops in the area - which is why a massive superstore is needed, in a location that people local to Ayers Road cannot easily access without a car.

Why aren't the Ayres Road shops mentioned? Because planners, the competition commission and government do not consider the small independent retailer. If you read the retail assessment it focuses on other chain stores despite the fact that in the catchment area for this application there are the Ayres Road shops, independent shops in Urmston, Stretford, Whalley Range, Sale, Ashton on Mersey and Chorlton which will all lose trade if this store is built.

Talk to any independent retailer at the moment and they will likely tell you that trade is down and for some it is a struggle to survive. It only takes a small dip in trade for a small retailer to become vulnerable and this is what a huge superstore on Chester Road represents. In contrast, does anyone know of a supermarket outlet closing in this recession?

What can you do?
- Object to the application
A Planning Inquiry in 2006 upheld Trafford Council’s refusal to grant Tesco permission to build a store of 88,095 sq ft. Reasons included the excessive negative effect it would have on local shops and on our environment

- write about the importance of your local shops to you - make the point that they have not been adequately considered in the evidence submitted by Tesco;

- Talk about the number of jobs these shops provide (research has shown that for every 20 jobs a supermarket creates 30 are lost in the lcoal economy);

- pose the question "How can this proposed store which is almost twice the size of the store refused in 2006 be of an appropriate scale?" (166,847 sq. ft now against 88,095 sq. ft in 2006);

Email your objection to simon.castle@trafford.gov.uk and/or Development.Control@ trafford.gov.uk and copy to our email address nomegatesco (at) googlemail.com
Also copy your email to your local councillor and MP.

Join our mailing list so we can keep up to date.

Follow this blog for news and updates.

Talk to your family and friends and ask them to object too.

Debbie Ellen

Planning Application is now in

The much anticipated planning application is now online.

Reference number 74393/FULL/2009

There are 120 documents (not all of which relate to the supermarket) but its a good deal to look at.

Headline: The Mega store element is not 140,000 sq feet - its 166,847 sq. feet (gross). That makes it roughly 3.4 times the size of the existing planning permission.

Any planning experts, do get in touch as we need to argue against the evidence they have submitted (PPG1, PPG6, RSS13 knowledge).

Contact us at nomegatesco@googlemail.com

Access all the documents here